Steffen
et al. (2015) debates whether the Great Acceleration can continue. They
argue that the history of economic growth has consisted of periods of recession
and boom; otherwise known as the business cycle trend. However, they then draw
on Costanza
et al.’s (2012) suggestion that the stabilisation of population may lead to
a stabilisation of economic growth. I however, am not convinced in the
slightest.
The first concept I learnt in economics was that of the
basic economic problem: scarcity. The nature of being human is that we always
want more. There is always something more we could have, and we strive to
achieve this maximum level of happiness through the acquisition of goods.
Resources are finite and are thus insufficient to satisfy all human desires.
Due to this, the population may begin to stabilise, but human aggregate demand,
may not fall. In fact, demand may increase, as there are fewer people to distribute
GDP to. Therefore, GDP per capita would be higher (as I’ve stated in a previous
post), encouraging people to spend more and fuelling economic growth.
Assets would continue to increase in value, as the economy
booms, until such a time when the ‘asset bubble’ bursts, and prices fall
dramatically. These exogenous variables have a detrimental effect on the
economy, which often leads to a recession. The economy then recovers and the
cycle continues. My view is therefore that, regardless of whether or not
population is stable, declining, or increasing, the business cycle will
continue. By collating UN
data, I have created a graph showing population growth and GDP growth for
Hungary between 1992 and 2014.
From this graph, it is clear that population growth has been
negative since 1992, demonstrating Hungary’s population decline. However, in
1992, GDP growth is shown to be at -3.06%, and in 2004, it is shown to be at
4.79%. This demonstrates that though population is declining, the nation
continues to undergo periods of boom and recession, i.e. the business cycle.
So, human population growth rates will not necessarily
affect aggregate demand unless population declines significantly enough. The
magnitude of effect that human activity is having on earth systems however, may
lead to investment and indeed the development of different markets. Next post will discuss emerging markets of the Anthropocene with the focus of prioritising planetary boundaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment